<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\nModule 3. TYPES OF ICH \u2013 CATEGORIZATION OF INTANGIBLE HERITAGE<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/thead> Description<\/strong><\/td> This module explores how intangible cultural heritage (ICH) is categorized, both within UNESCO\u2019s official framework and through alternative approaches proposed by scholars and practitioners. While UNESCO identifies five domains of ICH \u2013 oral traditions, performing arts, social practices, knowledge concerning nature and the universe, and traditional craftsmanship \u2013 heritage in practice often crosses these categories. Students will learn about the strengths and limits of classification systems, the risks of oversimplification, and new perspectives that emphasize values, practices, and relationships rather than rigid categories. The module also highlights the role of technology and innovation in categorization and safeguarding, with a particular focus on mapping projects and digital tools. A key case study \u2013 the CarPaTO project in \u021aara F\u0103g\u0103ra\u0219ului (Romania) \u2013 illustrates how regional mapping, community involvement, and creative outputs (exhibitions, cookbooks, participatory films) can strengthen safeguarding strategies and give visibility to heritage.<\/td><\/tr> Learning objectives <\/td> Learning objectives:
By the end of this module, learners will be able to:
\u2013 Identify UNESCO\u2019s five official domains of intangible cultural heritage and describe their key characteristics.
\u2013 Analyze the limitations of rigid categorization and explain how community perspectives may differ from institutional frameworks.
\u2013 Compare and evaluate alternative approaches to ICH categorization proposed by scholars (e.g., Lenzerini, Fredheim & Khalaf).
\u2013 Apply categorization frameworks to case studies (e.g., Mediterranean Diet, Junii Bra\u0219ovului, CarPaTO project) to understand how classification impacts safeguarding.
\u2013 Develop practical proposals for mapping and documenting ICH using innovative tools and community-based methods.<\/td><\/tr>No. hours<\/td> 300 minutes<\/td><\/tr> <\/td> Lesson Title<\/strong><\/td> Duration<\/td><\/tr> Lesson 1. Categorizing intangible cultural heritage. Approaches and challenges<\/td> 60 minutes<\/td><\/tr> Lesson 2. Limits and New Perspectives on Categorization<\/td> 60 minutes<\/td><\/tr> Lesson 3. Mapping and classifying cultural heritage: The CarPaTO Case Study<\/td> 60 minutes<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n